Holding Parents Responsible For Bad Students

[Scott]

Holding Parents Responsible For Bad Students
by Scott Hughes

A better education system greatly improves the quality of life in society. Improvements in education lead to a reduction in crime, poverty, and many other social ills. Well-educated people can achieve their goals, and live successfully and self-sufficiently. Moreover, well-educated people become productive, contributing members of society. For example, a successful doctor does not just achieve personal success, but he helps society in general by saving lives and making people healthier. In another example, businessmen provide desired products and services to society, in addition to achieving their own personal success.

Unfortunately, the modern education system leaves much to be desired. More than a quarter of U.S. schools are failing under the terms of President Bush's No Child Left Behind law. Many U.S. schools have dropout rates higher than their graduation rates. Many of the students who graduate still have a substandard education that holds them down for the rest of their life.

Generally, school administrators want to improve their schools, but they have too little funding and resources, and too many problem cases.

Incidentally, I would argue that schools could never provide the best education, because there is no one-size-fits-all education solution. However, there are still ways to drastically improve the education system.

I suggest we begin holding parents responsible for their children. We can blame the schools as much as we want, but most children do not fail in most schools. In the very same school, some children fail miserably and misbehave, while other children study, work hard, behave, and succeed. This makes it clear that the parents have failed, not just the school.

The parents and guardians of the children who fail need to be held responsible. We need to create a standard guideline to determine which children are performing so much worse than their peers that it is obvious their parents have failed them. Then, we need to remedy the situation. For example, we could remove every child with a GPA in the bottom 10% from their homes.

DCF or some other authority in charge of children's welfare needs to become involved.

In comparison, we would remove a child from the home if their parents or guardians abuse them. We would hold the parents financially liable for a child who vandalizes property. We need to hold parents to the same standards when their children fail miserably at school.

When a child fails while the vast majority of his classmates do not, then that is sufficient evidence to remove the child from his home. An investigation needs to be done to uncover the very rare circumstances when a child's misbehavior and failure is completely out of the control of the parents or guardians.

The best way to get the worst failing children back on track is probably to send them to boarding school. This will get them away from their home life, and thus stop that environment from causing further damage.

We can force the parents to pay for the children's tuition. Let's do it for the same reason we would make physically abusive parents pay for the abused child's medical bills.

If a child is physically hurt, we make the parents pay the medical bills--whether the child got hurt from the parent's neglect or from general poor parenting. If a child fails at school, let's make the parents pay for boarding school--whether the child failed from the parent's neglect or from general bad parenting.

The point is to make the responsible party pay the bill. I think it is about time we start holding parents responsible for their children. In the case of failing children, we also need to remove the children from their homes, because the parents are obviously too irresponsible to be left responsible for the children.

Nowadays, many parents have decided not to put in the effort it would take to homeschool (or unschool) their children. Instead, the parents send their kids to public schools. The least these parents could do is take care of their children enough that the children can succeed at school.

About the Author: Scott Hughes owns and manages Unschool.info which is an informative website about unschooling. You can discuss this article and related topics in the Education and Learning Forums. It's completely free, and all viewpoints are welcome.

Please post comments and feedback on the article.
_________________
Unschool.info ~ Please suggest ways to improve the website. I want it to be the best, and I rely on your comments and suggestions to make it so.

[DooraWrip]

I am not sure that it right choice
I am never know about it
thanks for info

[oscaroscarmommy]

Removing a child from his parents is very traumatic!!! This should only be done to protect a child from abuse/neglect. EDUCATION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SCHOOLS! If a child is doing poorly in school this is a reflection of the school and not of the child or parents. Perhaps schools should require more volunteer time from the parents. Employers should be required to allow mothers and father of school aged children volunteer leave.

Schools should have tutor class. A period of time everyday where older students help younger students finish their days assignements or homework. Teaching reinforces the facts for the older kids, and makes the learning fun for the younger kids.

Schools should not be concerned with tests, a child should move ahead when they are able to complete the grade level assignments with ease. If a child struggles, they may need another year or two of practice to get it right. There shouldn't be such a rush to finish school by 18 years of age. It may help to have more mixed grade classes.

Overall school is boring and a chore for most kids. Teachers and school officials need to work together to make the learning more fun for the kids.

[oscaroscarmommy]

Oh ya, by the way, every child is an individual and has her own way of learning. How very ignorant to assume that a child does poorly at school as opposed to her peers because of her home or her parents. The science is clear that people have different learning styles. It is also clear that the public schools cater to the auditory and visual learners.

Oh and again, to remove a child from her home is VERY TRAUMATIC. If the goal is to produce mentally and emotionally stable members of society then this certainly wouldn't be the way to go about it!